Consultation Form

Instagram

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About you

This form is for submissions to the ICVCM’s consultation on the CCP Rule Architecture. You can read the full consultation details on the consultation page .

Please make sure you have read the full consultation document before responding to the questions in this form.

Name*

Prefix First Last

Email*

Are you responding as…*

Organisation*

Where is your organisation headquartered?*

Other location*

My organisation is…*

Choose the one most suitable response below

Other organisation type*

How often do you or your organisation consult or use the ICVCM Assessment Framework criteria and requirements?*

Choose the most applicable

Briefly describe the reasons why you are responding to this consultation*

Briefly describe your relevant expertise or experience in carbon markets*

Consultation questions

How clear do you find the distinctions between the different instrument types: Interpretations, Technical Notices, and Clarifications? What, if anything, would benefit from further explanation?

What factors should influence ICVCM’s choice between an Interpretation, a Technical Notice, and a Clarification for a given topic?

For what types of technical updates do you think this system will work well, and where might it be less suitable?

What factors should guide whether a grace period is needed before entry into force on the effective date and how long such a grace period should be?

The rule architecture is designed to avoid retroactive effects. What factors or safeguards should ICVCM take into account in avoiding retroactivity?

In terms of your ability to keep up to date with ICVCM’s work as it develops and publishes these instruments, would your organisation find it easier to keep up to date if the changes were:

Published on a rolling basis, as and when each is ready.

Published at predictable frequencies, in batches (e.g., twice per year).

A mix of the above, depending on the urgency.

It is not important to my organisation.

Please explain your choice, if needed

Should CCP-Eligible Programs be able to request that ICVCM consider introducing an Interpretation, Technical Notice or Clarification?

What factors should ICVCM take into account in deciding whether to do so?

Should any other stakeholders be able to request that ICVCM consider introducing an Interpretation, Technical Notice, or Clarification?

Which stakeholders, and what factors should ICVCM take into account in deciding whether to do so?

Are there any specific CCP criteria or requirements for which Interpretations, Technical Notices or Clarifications might not work well, due to the nature of the existing rule?

Please see the full set of requirements of the Assessment Framework .

How we can contact you

Outcomes of public consultation

Yes, I wish to receive future updates on any outcomes of this public consultation

Please tick to agree.

Submission clarifications

Yes, I am happy for ICVCM to contact me if further clarification is required in regards to my submission

Please tick to agree.

ICVCM Newsletter

Yes, I am happy for ICVCM to add me to their email newsletter

Please tick to agree.

We will only use your information to send you the communications you select. Read our Privacy Policy to learn how we protect your data and your rights.

Please make sure you have read the publicity notice in the consultation document before you submit your response.

CCP Rule Architecture

CCP Rule Architecture Consultation

About you

Consultation questions

How we can contact you